But an adult’s adaptation of new behaviour is his choice.Īnalytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. My conclusion for this experiment is that behaviour is truly learned from experiences (heard and seen) and the younger one learns an action, the more likely that it will be moulded into his being/behaviour/lifestyle. Even if the doll was substituted with a live cat (apologies-just an example), the children will still act out what adults did but it will not be true with adult participants. I think the result of this experiment would be different if adults were the participants. Secondly, the experiment was a model of ‘conditioning’ and not free will. I believe that their actions were parts imitation and curiosity and at the same time liberation that they could do what they think they could do with the doll without being judged by the adult (since children’s actions are controlled by adults). The experiment used a doll and this is understood by children as a toy (an inanimate object which could be deformed, thrown, etc). Children do not have a strong base of morality, they do not fully know what is right or wrong and merely rely and mimic what they hear and see (feeds)from adults. Publications > Observer > Observations > Bandura and BoboĮvaluating the Bobo Doll experiment: Since the experiment was made using children and relying on these children’s judgement, in my humble opinion, is not a strong result. It’s an impressive legacy for a project that began with a little creativity and an inflatable clown. He was also named among the top five most eminent 20 th century psychologists by the Review of General Psychology. Bandura is a member of an elite group who received both APS lifetime achievement awards: the William James and James Mckeen Cattell Fellow Awards. His Bobo-inspired social learning theory also contributed to the development of cognitive-behavioral therapy. Today, questions about violent media and video games linger, so Bandura’s research on aggression remains relevant. ![]() “Bandura’s findings were particularly important in 1960s America, when lawmakers, broadcasters, and the general public were engaged in serious debate regarding the effects of television violence on the behavior of children,” she says. ![]() Since Bandura donated his original Bobo doll in May 2010, it has been one of the Center’s most popular exhibits.įaye notes that the Bobo doll experiments were also influential outside of the scientific community. ![]() “In many respects, this research helped create the shift in psychology from a behavioristic to a social-cognitive approach to learning,” says Cathy Faye, Assistant Director of the Center for the History of Psychology at The University of Akron. He suggested that people could learn by observing and imitating others’ behavior. Children who were exposed to a non-aggressive adult or no model at all had far less aggression toward Bobo.īandura’s findings challenged the widely accepted behaviorist view that rewards and punishments are essential to learning. They even came up with new ways to hurt Bobo, such as throwing darts or aiming a toy gun at him. Similar to their adult models, the children kicked the doll, hit it with a mallet, and threw it in the air. The doll, called Bobo, was the opposite of menacing with its wide, ecstatic grin and goofy clown outfit.īut when it was their own turn to play with Bobo, children who witnessed an adult pummeling the doll were likely to show aggression too. In 1961, children in APS Fellow Albert Bandura’s laboratory witnessed an adult beating up an inflatable clown.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |